CalcPerks
Health

Target Heart Rate Calculator

Find your max heart rate and five training zones in bpm.

Enter your age to see your estimated maximum heart rate and five training zones. Add your resting heart rate for more personalised zones via the Karvonen method.

Zones use the Tanaka formula (208 − 0.7 × age), which fits adult data better than the older 220 − age rule.

Estimated maximum heart rate
180 bpm
Tanaka — Haskell (220 − age) gives 180 bpm
Zone 1 — Recovery90–108 bpm
Zone 2 — Endurance108–126 bpm
Zone 3 — Aerobic126–144 bpm
Zone 4 — Threshold144–162 bpm
Zone 5 — Maximum162–180 bpm
MethodPercentage of max HR
Heart rate reserve
Age-predicted maximums carry a standard deviation of about 10–12 bpm, so your true maximum may sit well either side. Beta blockers and some other medications lower both resting and maximum heart rate, making these zones inaccurate. This is general information, not medical advice — get clearance from a doctor before vigorous exercise if you have heart disease, high blood pressure or diabetes, and stop for chest pain or fainting.
Your training zones
Zone 1 — Recovery · 90–108 bpmZone 2 — Endurance · 108–126 bpmZone 3 — Aerobic · 126–144 bpmZone 4 — Threshold · 144–162 bpmZone 5 — Maximum · 162–180 bpm

Most endurance training should sit in Zone 2 — 108–126 bpm.

How to use this calculator#

  1. Enter your ageThat alone produces an estimated maximum heart rate and all five zones. Tanaka (208 − 0.7 × age) is the default because it fits adult data better than 220 − age, especially over 40, where the old rule reads roughly 9 bpm low at age 70.
  2. Measure resting heart rate properly before entering itTake it first thing in the morning, lying still, before you get out of bed and before caffeine. Count for a full 60 seconds, or read it from a wearable's overnight low. Average three to five mornings — a single reading after a bad night can be 10 bpm off.
  3. Use the Karvonen zones if you gave a resting rateKarvonen works from heart rate reserve, the gap between resting and maximum, so it accounts for how fit you are. It produces higher and more personalised targets than a flat percentage of maximum, and the difference grows the lower your resting heart rate is.
  4. Spend most of your time in the low zonesEndurance training across many sports converges on roughly 80% of volume in zones 1–2 and 20% in zones 4–5. Training everything in the middle is the classic mistake — too hard to recover from, too easy to drive adaptation.
  5. Cross-check the zones against how you feelZone 2 should let you hold a full conversation. Zone 4 should limit you to a few words at a time. If the numbers and the talk test disagree badly, the age-predicted maximum is probably wrong for you — the prediction carries a standard deviation of about 10–12 bpm.

The formula#

Tanaka (2001) maximum heart rate with Karvonen heart rate reserve zones

HRmax = 208 − (0.7 × age) • percentage-of-max target = HRmax × intensity • Karvonen target = HRrest + (HRmax − HRrest) × intensity

HRmax
Estimated maximum heart rate in beats per minute
age
Age in years
HRrest
Resting heart rate, measured at rest on waking
HRmax − HRrest
Heart rate reserve — the working range between rest and maximum
intensity
Target intensity as a decimal — 0.60 to 0.70 for zone 2, 0.80 to 0.90 for zone 4

Tanaka, Monahan and Seals published the 208 − 0.7 × age equation in 2001 from a meta-analysis of 351 studies covering more than 18,000 people, plus a laboratory validation in 514 healthy adults. It was derived on healthy adults across a wide age range and is independent of sex and habitual activity level. The older 220 − age rule traces to Fox, Naughton and Haskell in 1971 and was never presented as a validated formula. Both carry a standard deviation of roughly 10–12 bpm, so an individual can sit 20 bpm either side of the prediction and be entirely normal; only a supervised graded exercise test establishes a true maximum.

Two ways to estimate maximum heart rate#

The familiar 220 minus age rule comes from Haskell and Fox in 1971 and was never intended as a precise formula. Tanaka's 2001 equation, 208 minus 0.7 times age, fits large adult datasets better, particularly for people over 40. The gap widens with age: at 70, Tanaka gives 159 bpm against the old rule's 150.

Both carry a standard deviation of roughly 10-12 beats per minute, so an individual can sit twenty beats either side of the prediction and be entirely normal. A supervised graded exercise test is the only way to establish your true maximum.

What the five zones are for#

Zone 1 at 50-60% is warm-up and recovery. Zone 2 at 60-70% builds the aerobic base and fat oxidation, and should make up most weekly volume. Zone 3 at 70-80% improves general cardiovascular fitness. Zone 4 at 80-90% raises lactate threshold, and Zone 5 at 90-100% is reserved for short, hard intervals.

Entering a resting heart rate switches the calculation to the Karvonen method, which works from heart rate reserve: resting plus the target percentage of the gap between resting and maximum. For a 40-year-old with a maximum of 180 and a resting rate of 60, Zone 2 becomes 132-144 bpm rather than the 108-126 bpm a plain percentage gives.

Using zones sensibly#

Measure resting heart rate in the morning before getting out of bed, averaged over several days. Beta blockers, calcium channel blockers and some other medications lower both resting and maximum heart rate, which makes every age-predicted zone wrong; perceived exertion or a clinician-set target is more appropriate in that case.

These figures are general information, not medical advice. Get clearance from a doctor before starting vigorous exercise if you are over 40, sedentary, or have heart disease, high blood pressure or diabetes. Stop immediately and seek help for chest pain, unusual breathlessness, fainting or an irregular pounding heartbeat.

Worked examples#

40-year-old, percentage-of-maximum zones

Building all five zones from the Tanaka estimate alone.

  1. HRmax = 208 − (0.7 × 40) = 208 − 28 = 180 bpm
  2. Zone 1, 50–60%: 0.50 × 180 = 90 to 0.60 × 180 = 108 bpm
  3. Zone 2, 60–70%: 108 to 126 bpm
  4. Zone 3, 70–80%: 126 to 144 bpm
  5. Zone 4, 80–90%: 144 to 162 bpm
  6. Zone 5, 90–100%: 162 to 180 bpm

A maximum of 180 bpm with zone 2 at 108–126 bpm. At exactly 40 the two formulas happen to agree — 220 − 40 is also 180 — which is why the difference between them only becomes obvious at other ages.

The same 40-year-old with a resting heart rate of 60, using Karvonen

Switching from a flat percentage of maximum to heart rate reserve.

  1. Heart rate reserve = 180 − 60 = 120 bpm
  2. Zone 2 lower bound = 60 + (0.60 × 120) = 60 + 72 = 132 bpm
  3. Zone 2 upper bound = 60 + (0.70 × 120) = 60 + 84 = 144 bpm
  4. Zone 4 = 60 + (0.80 × 120) to 60 + (0.90 × 120) = 156 to 168 bpm

Zone 2 becomes 132–144 bpm rather than 108–126 bpm — 24 bpm higher at the bottom. Following the percentage-of-max numbers would leave this person training well below the intensity they intended, which is the practical reason to enter a resting heart rate when you have one.

Reference tables#

Estimated maximum heart rate and key zones by ageTanaka (208 − 0.7 × age), with the older 220 − age shown for comparison. Percentages of maximum, not Karvonen.
AgeHRmax (Tanaka)220 − ageZone 2 (60–70%)Zone 4 (80–90%)
20194 bpm200 bpm116 – 136155 – 175
25191 bpm195 bpm114 – 133152 – 171
30187 bpm190 bpm112 – 131150 – 168
35184 bpm185 bpm110 – 128147 – 165
40180 bpm180 bpm108 – 126144 – 162
45177 bpm175 bpm106 – 124141 – 159
50173 bpm170 bpm104 – 121138 – 156
55170 bpm165 bpm102 – 119136 – 153
60166 bpm160 bpm100 – 116133 – 149
65163 bpm155 bpm98 – 114130 – 146
70159 bpm150 bpm95 – 111127 – 143

The two formulas cross at age 40 and diverge in both directions from there — 220 − age reads 6 bpm high at 20 and 9 bpm low at 70. Every figure here is a population estimate with a standard deviation around 10–12 bpm.

What each training zone is forPercentages refer to maximum heart rate. The talk test is the field check.
Zone% of maxPurposeTalk test
Zone 1 — Recovery50 – 60%Warm-up, cool-down, active recovery between hard daysFull conversation, easy breathing
Zone 2 — Endurance60 – 70%Aerobic base and fat metabolism; most weekly volume belongs hereComfortable conversation in full sentences
Zone 3 — Aerobic70 – 80%General cardiovascular fitness; steady-state workShort sentences only
Zone 4 — Threshold80 – 90%Raises lactate threshold and sustainable speedA few words at a time
Zone 5 — Maximum90 – 100%Short intervals for peak power and VO₂maxSpeech not possible

Heart rate lags effort by a minute or more and drifts upward over a long session at constant effort, so it is a poor guide for intervals shorter than about three minutes. Use it for steady work and perceived effort for the sharp stuff.

Percentage of maximum versus KarvonenA 40-year-old with HRmax 180 bpm and a resting heart rate of 60 bpm.
ZoneIntensity% of max targetKarvonen target
Zone 150 – 60%90 – 108 bpm120 – 132 bpm
Zone 260 – 70%108 – 126 bpm132 – 144 bpm
Zone 370 – 80%126 – 144 bpm144 – 156 bpm
Zone 480 – 90%144 – 162 bpm156 – 168 bpm
Zone 590 – 100%162 – 180 bpm168 – 180 bpm

The two methods converge at 100% and diverge most at the bottom. The lower your resting heart rate, the bigger the gap — which is why fitter people are the ones most likely to under-train if they follow plain percentage-of-max numbers.

Common mistakes#

  • Treating an age-predicted maximum as your actual maximumThe prediction has a standard deviation of roughly 10–12 bpm, so about a third of people sit more than 10 bpm away from it. If your zones consistently feel far too easy or impossible, trust the talk test and perceived effort over the arithmetic.
  • Ignoring heart rate medicationBeta blockers, and some calcium channel blockers and antiarrhythmics, lower both resting and maximum heart rate — sometimes substantially. Every age-based zone becomes wrong on these drugs. Ask your prescriber for targets, or train by perceived exertion instead.
  • Mixing the two methods without noticingA 60–70% zone means completely different bpm ranges under percentage-of-max and Karvonen — 108–126 versus 132–144 for the worked example. Following a plan written for one while your watch is set to the other means training in the wrong zone every session.
  • Living in zone 3The middle zone feels productive and is the easiest place to drift into. It is too hard to accumulate large volume in and too easy to drive top-end adaptation, so weeks spent there tend to produce fatigue without progress. Keep easy days genuinely easy.

Frequently asked questions#

Is 220 minus age accurate?

It is a rough guide with an error margin of about 10-12 beats per minute. The Tanaka formula, 208 minus 0.7 times age, fits adult data better, especially over 40.

What is the Karvonen method?

It calculates zones from heart rate reserve, the gap between your resting and maximum heart rate, rather than a straight percentage of maximum. It gives more personalised and usually higher targets.

Which zone burns the most fat?

Zone 2 uses the highest proportion of fat for fuel, but higher intensities burn more total calories. For fat loss, total energy expenditure and diet matter more than the zone you train in.

Does medication change my heart rate zones?

Yes. Beta blockers and some other drugs lower both resting and maximum heart rate, so age-based zones will be wrong. Ask your doctor for appropriate targets.

Key terms#

Maximum heart rate (HRmax)
The highest rate your heart can beat during all-out effort. It declines with age, is largely unaffected by training, and is only established properly by a supervised graded exercise test.
Resting heart rate (HRrest)
Beats per minute at complete rest, best measured on waking before rising. Typically 60–100 bpm in adults and often 40–60 in trained endurance athletes.
Heart rate reserve (HRR)
Maximum heart rate minus resting heart rate — the usable range between rest and all-out effort. The basis of the Karvonen method.
Karvonen method
Calculating a target as resting heart rate plus a percentage of heart rate reserve. It personalises zones to your fitness and gives higher targets than a plain percentage of maximum.
Lactate threshold
The intensity above which blood lactate accumulates faster than it can be cleared, marking the point where effort becomes unsustainable. Zone 4 work is aimed at raising it.
Cardiac drift
The gradual rise in heart rate during prolonged steady exercise at constant effort, driven by rising core temperature and falling blood volume. It is why heart rate alone can overstate intensity late in a long session.

Sources#

Put this calculator on your site

Free, no sign-up, and no attribution fee — just keep the credit line that comes with the code. The calculator stays up to date automatically.

Preview the embed →